General

general@lists.hackerspace.pl

1068 discussions

Start a nNew thread

Re: [HS General] Odp: Wróg nie śpi i spod wąsa się śmieje
by karyna 15 Jan '16

15 Jan '16

{Wiktor} hint: siedzi tu a). karyna soze b). keyser h4x0r co konto przejął You never know! -- Keyser Söze?

11 15

I AM SPARTACUS
by karyna 15 Jan '16

15 Jan '16

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u93bhAimFFU http://poczta.onet.pl/ login karyna(a)spoko.pl hasło vezi0jaiHoo3 -- Keyser Söze

2 1

Odp: Wróg nie śpi i spod wąsa się śmieje
by karyna 14 Jan '16

14 Jan '16

{implr} albo nasz pan leaker sie chce anonimizowac przez oddanie tozsamoscix D > pan > leaker https://www.facebook.com/161wwa/posts/466749233532341 -- Keyser Söze

1 0

Fwd: Prośba o pomoc - tekst o wpłatomacie
by rysiek 14 Jan '16

14 Jan '16

Elo, mamy jakichś "Mistrzów Zakonu Hackerspace"? ;) Portal technologie.gazeta.pl robi tekst o wpłatomatach i ich failach, szukają eksperckiej opinii. Ma ktoś ochotę? Może Gustaw Łeldon? ;) Z p. Kędzierskim korespondujemy od jakiegoś czasu (zaczęło się od mojego sprzeciwu na "hakera" gdzieś 2 lata temu; od tej pory jego teksty dosyć dobrze sobie z tym terminem radzą), raczej rzetelny dziennikarz, choć warto działać z założeniem, że każdy fragment korespondencji może zostać zacytowany -- jak to z dziennikarzem. Dajcie znać. ---------- Treść przekazywanej wiadomości ---------- Temat: Prośba o pomoc - tekst o wpłatomacie Data: środa, 13 stycznia 2016, 00:44:56 Od: Robert Kędzierski Do: rysiek Witaj! Czy mogę Cię pomoc o ekspercką opinię w kwestii pewnego wpłatomatu? Wczoraj na Wykopie pojawił się wpis: Koleś wpłacał w Wawie 5400zl, wpłatomat się zwiesił, karta wciągnięta... Brzmi jak standard, ale człowiek twierdzi, że po jego transakcji nie ma śladu. http://www.wykop.pl/artykul/2958125/zostalem-okradziony-przez-wplatomat-pro… Czy możesz proszę rzucić okiem o wydać jakąś ocenę. Rozumiem, że trudno będzie "bez kwitów" odnieść się do tego przypadku, to może ogólniej: czy wpłatomaty są bezpieczne, co w nich bezpiecznego nie jest, czy da się je oszukać, czy one mogą oszukać (w komentarzach wiele historii w stylu: kasy nie ma i koniec). Będę wdzięczny za pomoc lub przekazanie tego do mniej zajętego Mistrza Zakonu Hackerspace? Chcemy zrobić z tego spory materiał i wyjaśnić w nim jak najwięcej mitów, niedomówień. Pozdrawiam Robert Kędzierski Redaktor portali technologicznych Gazeta.pl ----------------------------------------- -- Pozdrawiam, Michał "rysiek" Woźniak Zmieniam klucz GPG :: http://rys.io/pl/147 GPG Key Transition :: http://rys.io/en/147

3 2

Armourcard - RFID jammer
by viq 09 Jan '16

09 Jan '16

http://www.armourcard.com/ -- viq

1 0

Hackerspace Woodstock lista mailowa
by Wiktor Przybylski 08 Jan '16

08 Jan '16

Hej. Wszystkich chętnych do wspólnego ogarniania przyszłorocznego brudstoku zapraszam na grupe woodstock(a)lists.hackerspace.pl Powoli zaczynam gadać z WŚOPem o tegorocznym projekcie, myślimy powolutku o skompletowaniu badziewia, żeby być lepiej przygotowanym (np namiot byłby fajny, w zeszłym roku był tylko teoretycznie xD) Zapraszam. Czy coś.

1 0

Fwd: Sign on - Letter supporting encryption globally
by rysiek 07 Jan '16

07 Jan '16

Taka akcja. Jeszcze się można dopisać, rusza wsio w poniedziałek. ---------- Treść przekazywanej wiadomości ---------- Hi, Access Now has been working with civil liberties groups and experts to draft an open letter to government leaders around the world to support a positive encryption agenda / reject bad policies. The letter has been finalised and we're now reaching out to groups, companies, and individuals to see if they would be interested to sign on. The full text of the letter is pasted below and attached. Please note that this is not public yet and we would appreciate if you do not publicly post or host the text until we're ready to launch! Text of Letter: SHORT TEXT (for website): An open letter to the leaders of the world’s governments - We encourage world leaders to support the safety and security of users, companies, and governments by strengthening the integrity of communications and systems. In doing so, governments should reject laws, policies, or other mandates or practices, including secret agreements with companies, that limit access to or undermine encryption and other secure communications tools and technologies. * Governments should not ban or otherwise limit user access to encryption in any form or otherwise prohibit the implementation or use of encryption by grade or type; * Governments should not mandate the design or implementation of “backdoors” or vulnerabilities into tools, technologies, or services; * Governments should not require that tools, technologies, or services are designed or developed to allow for third-party access to unencrypted data or encryption keys; * Governments should not seek to weaken or undermine encryption standards or intentionally influence the establishment of encryption standards except to promote a higher level of information security. No government should mandate insecure encryption algorithms, standards, tools, or technologies; and * Governments should not, either by private or public agreement, compel or pressure an entity to engage in activity that is inconsistent with the above tenets. FULL LETTER: An open letter to the leaders of the world’s governments - We urge you to protect the security of your citizens, your economy, and your government by supporting the development and use of secure communications tools and technologies, rejecting policies that would prevent or undermine the use of strong encryption, and urging other leaders to do the same. Encryption tools, technologies, and services are essential to protect against harm and to shield our digital infrastructure and personal communications from unauthorized access. The ability to freely develop and use encryption provides the cornerstone for today’s global economy. Economic growth in the digital age is powered by the ability to trust and authenticate our interactions and communicate and conduct business securely, both within and across borders. Some of the most noted technologists and experts on encryption recently explained that laws or policies that undermine encryption would “force a U-turn from the best practices now being deployed to make the Internet more secure,” “would substantially increase system complexity” and raise associated costs, and “would create concentrated targets that could attract bad actors.” The absence of encryption facilitates easy access to sensitive personal data, including financial and identity information, by criminals and other malicious actors. Once obtained, sensitive data can be sold, publicly posted, or used to blackmail or embarrass an individual. Additionally, insufficiently encrypted devices or hardware are prime targets for criminals. The United Nations Special Rapporteur for freedom of expression has noted, “encryption and anonymity, and the security concepts behind them, provide the privacy and security necessary for the exercise of the right to freedom of opinion and expression in the digital age.” As we move toward connecting the next billion users, restrictions on encryption in any country will likely have global impact. Encryption and other anonymizing tools and technologies enable lawyers, journalists, whistleblowers, and organizers to communicate freely across borders and to work to better their communities. It also assures users of the integrity of their data and authenticates individuals to companies, governments, and one another. We encourage you to support the safety and security of users by strengthening the integrity of communications and systems. All governments should reject laws, policies, or other mandates or practices, including secret agreements with companies, that limit access to or undermine encryption and other secure communications tools and technologies. Users should have the option to use – and companies the option to provide - the strongest encryption available, including end-to-end encryption, without fear that governments will compel access to the content, metadata, or encryption keys without due process and respect for human rights. Accordingly: * Governments should not ban or otherwise limit user access to encryption in any form or otherwise prohibit the implementation or use of encryption by grade or type; * Governments should not mandate the design or implementation of “backdoors” or vulnerabilities into tools, technologies, or services; * Governments should not require that tools, technologies, or services are designed or developed to allow for third-party access to unencrypted data or encryption keys; * Governments should not seek to weaken or undermine encryption standards or intentionally influence the establishment of encryption standards except to promote a higher level of information security. No government should mandate insecure encryption algorithms, standards, tools, or technologies; and * Governments should not, either by private or public agreement, compel or pressure an entity to engage in activity that is inconsistent with the above tenets. Strong encryption and the secure tools and systems that rely on it are critical to improving cybersecurity, fostering the digital economy, and protecting users. Our continued ability to leverage the internet for global growth and prosperity and as a tool for organizers and activists requires the ability and the right to communicate privately and securely through trustworthy networks. We look forward to working together toward a more secure future. Sincerely, -- Estelle Massé Policy Analyst Access Now | accessnow.org [1] PGP ID: 0x7A755A5F Fingerprint AA1D DF94 B562 C4DB 7C8C 182B 9610 B746 7A75 5A5F +32 485 44 54 58 +32 2 274 25 74 SUBMIT a session or get your tickets for RightsCon [2], March 30th-April1st, 2016 __ __ Links: ------ [1] http://accessnow.org [2] https://rightscon.org ----------------------------------------- -- Pozdrawiam, Michał "rysiek" Woźniak Zmieniam klucz GPG :: http://rys.io/pl/147 GPG Key Transition :: http://rys.io/en/147

1 0

China passes controversial counter-terrorism law | Reuters
by viq 28 Dec '15

28 Dec '15

http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN0UA07220151227 -- viq

3 2

Stuff na sprzedaż
by Sergiusz Bazański 25 Dec '15

25 Dec '15

No to skoro moralnie akceptowalne jest wysyłanie stuffu na sprzedaż na listy spejsowe, to też się dołączę \o/. Ceny wyjściowe do negocjacji. - 2x SO-DIM DDR3 4GB - 80zł za moduł - Stary pecet z i7-2600, ASUS 6950, bez RAMu i dysku, zasilacz z białej listy - 1200zł - Samsung 206BW, 1600x900 - 200zł - Mac Mini G4, + zasilacz - 200zł - Amiga 500, z expandowanym RAMem, toną dyskietek - 300zł - Rigol DS1054e, 2 sondy 100MHz, źle chodzący enkoder przy skali poziomej - 400zł - Kontroler MIDI CME M-Key v2 USB, 49 klawiszy - 200zł - Rozmontowany na części pierwsze Align T-Rex 500, flybarowy, parę ułamanych zębatek (po wypadku), bez aparatury, odbiornika i baterii - 800zł - Akceptor banknotów Smiley NV8M, na PLN, SSP/Parallel/Binary - 150zł - 2x GameBoy classic, bez przednich bezeli, jeden bez klapki - 50zł sztuka - Switch TP-Link SG3424, 24x GbE, zarządzalny - 800zł -- Sergiusz 'q3k' Bazański xmpp/email: q3k(a)q3k.org

9 12

State considered harmful - A proposal for a stateless laptop
by viq 24 Dec '15

24 Dec '15

Rutkowska znowu sprawia, że czacha dymi. https://blog.invisiblethings.org/2015/12/23/state_harmful.html -- viq <viq(a)hackerspace.pl>

3 3

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

General