Joł,
my sides: http://www.notbeinggoverned.com/mastercard-goes-full-retard-bitcoin/
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bitcoin is unstable in terms of “intrinsic” value Bitcoin doesn’t offer the “recourse” that consumers are “naturally” expecting day to day from using…. cash? Bitcoin serves a purpose that is not necessarily, completely clear Bitcoin guarantees anonymity, like electronic cash Bitcoin is not transparent, like MasterCard wants to be Bitcoin goes against the whole principle of moving to a world beyond cash with greater transparency, security and simplicity Bitcoin is created on an anonymous computer in an anonymous location Bitcoin is outside the control of MasterCard and the government. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Najlepszy fragment to chyba od 01:13. Wywód: - ludzie lubią bitcoina, bo daje im anonimowość - to trochę jak gotówka - MasterCard chce iść "beyond cash", bo cash jest niewygodna - Bitcoin zatem jest niewygodny, jak gotówka
I am facing my palm.